In the continuing trend of talking about our culture’s growing
infatuation and dependence on our technology, today I will talk about whether
or not we are controlling our technology or if it is controlling us. I have to
admit when you see that pearlescent blue glow on the zombified face of a friend
or loved one as they check their twitter, it is easy to begin questioning who
is really in charge. Another thing that scares me is when you climb into one of
these new tricked out rolling super computers they call cars now a days and I can
literally feel all of the wire and sensors in between me and the actual
vehicle. All this aside, I do not think that technology would ever be able to
run our lives to the point of subservience. I am not necessarily referring to
some Terminator like scenario or even one concerning people getting to
the point where they completely control their lives from some control room. Even
our discussion of it in a liberal arts prerequisite class shows my point. Our concern
of the topic when it is less than a major issue shows that I don’t think we
would ever let it get to that point. This also relates to the fact that humans
have a natural resistance to domination. I think that the urgency in which we address
our electronic devices is more contributed to the dramatic nature we the people
tend to have and less to any current real threat. For example, I can remember
rushing home every Friday night to be home by four o’clock to catch my favorite
show. All I can say for absolutely sure is that I’m not letting it control me,
won’t you join me.

Tuesday, October 29, 2013
Our Latest Update
Friday, October 25, 2013
A Turkle coming Out of Her Technological Shell
The reason for this blog post is analyze the lecture of
Sherry Turkle. She feels that we are becoming too enslaved by our technological
devices. Technically speaking she thinks that people are beginning to prefer to
interact with each other through their technical devices like your cell phone
or tablet. This is actually something I agree with and have given significant thought
to. I have noticed a trend in these
people on social websites who cry out for help with depressing status updates
and dreary photos. Then these people refuse any physical interactions sometimes
hosted through that very social website. Another thing I’ve noticed become more
popular is people using these outlets to post things like, “I’m bored, text me.”
This shows me that people have begun to relate social websites to how a person
would have used to feel about the typical bar scene and text messaging has
replaced “asking someone up to your place” for a choice of phrase. A good
example of how this is engraining itself into our society is a movie called Robot
and Frank. In this movie technology has advanced to the point that these
humanoid robots have been developed to care for and provide companionship for
the elderly. One line that I really enjoyed from her speech and that really
stuck with me was when she said, “the illusions of companionship without the
demands of friendship”. I like how she is basically saying that it is easy to like
someone’s status on Facebook, but when you invite everyone to your party and
how many of them do you actually expect to show up. My generation actually has
a phrase for this; it’s called a ‘Facebook invite’. I try to remain physically
connected to me friends but I know the appeal of the filter bubble. It’s nice
to choose when and where you interact with someone without ever having to leave
home. I’m not necessarily concerned with trackers but I do acknowledge that a
person should keep the threat in mind. I think the worst example that I can
think of that I would consider myself guilty of this is when I was talking
about commenting on someone’s status and I said that I preferred to speak that
way because you could say everything you were thinking without being interrupted.
This is my feelings on the subject and what I took away from Sherry Turkle’s
seminar.
Tuesday, October 22, 2013
Our Own Understanding
This is what I believe is the purpose of the Essay 3
Assignment. This assignment seems to be engineered to summarize the skills we
have acquired from the previous to assignments. We were first taught what
exactly logos, pathos, and ethos were. We were taught several other literary
tools but these seemed to have special focus which told me they would be more relevant
to future material. This is most likely because identifying these elements in a
piece is most crucial in determining the creditability of the information the
author is presenting us. Before we can store and begin regurgitating various facts,
we must first be sure of their source and that source’s integrity. We had to
use this when we had to identify and analyze these skills in ourselves and
decide where we needed improvement and what we had a grasp of. Now we will use
this knowledge to gain our own repertoire of information on a subject and using
the other tools I neglected to mention before present or own paper that
contains coherent and organized data in our own words. This will give us the
opportunity to get a road test of all these things we have learned and apply
them to a real world scenario. I personally now have a better understanding of
what source will yield good, reliable news and what sources could be described
as opinionated. This is going to help me write a more scholarly looking essay
which has proven difficulty for me in the past. That is the third Essay
Assignment to the best of my understanding.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)